Hey Clayton, I can let you know what happened at the last print competition when I entered my carbon pigment print...(heehee) After looking closely at my print, the judge asked me if it was a contact print. (large negative) I informed her that it was digital capture and printed with an inkjet. She looked much closer for a little longer. She was impressed with the print quality. Unfortunately I didn't win any ribbons. Just 'cause you have a nicely printed print doesn't necessarily mean it appeals to the judge. Oh well. I like it and that's what matters. And I don't often like one of my own. Besides, there are many talented photographers in that group. Thanks for the heads up on the EEM. Barbara --- Message: 6 Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:41:11 -0000 From: "Clayton Jones" <cj@...> Subject: Re: Digest Number 2160 Hello Barbara, >I will more than likely be bringing a B&W print using the carbon on >cotton process (MIS UT and Epson EEM). Please be aware that EEM is not a cotton paper. Don't let someone at the meeting pick you apart on a technicality and detract from the issue of print quality. Best to use a true cotton paper or else call it something else. I prefer the term "carbon ink print", many use "carbon pigment print" - whatever you use, DON'T call it a "carbon print" because that's the name of another process - the carbon print people are very touchy about the digi folks stealing their name (understandably so). Let us know what happens. I love the "shock and awe" stories, like Austin's the other day. Great stuff <g>. Regards, Clayton
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Digest Number 2162/Houston/UT and EEM
2004-03-17 by Barbara Lee Spinnenweber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.