I currently use a 1200 with mis-vm inks and am reasonably satisfied; I am comfortable with the process, like the results and problems (clogs) are mininal. I would like to hear from anyone who has switched from a 1200 with vm inks to a 1280 using the ut2 inks. I am not that concerned about glossy paper; is there a noticable difference on EAM or PR papers? I have a 1280 which I use infrequently for color and am wondering if it is time to switch. The UT2 inks seem to be the way to go, but I wonder about the relative difference with what I am using at this point. Steve
Message
1200/vm vs. 1280 ut2
2004-03-26 by Stephen Kobrin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.