Thanks Matt, Sounds like it is worth a try. Since I have the printer, my only expense will be the carts. Steve --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Haber" <matt@m...> wrote: > Steve-- > > I just did exactly that. I have printed exactly one print on the 1280, > and that was on PGPP, but the dmax difference between that and > the same print on HWM was stunning ( I should, of course, do an > apples to apples comparison. I will, this weekend). I found that the > 1200 prints were "rough" (paul roark's term) compared to a similar > print in color on my 1270--that's part of what drove me to the > change. That, the ability to print on glossy, and the dmax. > > matt > > > I currently use a 1200 with mis-vm inks and am reasonably satisfied; > > I am comfortable with the process, like the results and problems > > (clogs) are mininal. I would like to hear from anyone who has > > switched from a 1200 with vm inks to a 1280 using the ut2 inks. I am > > not that concerned about glossy paper; is there a noticable > > difference on EAM or PR papers? > > -- > Matt Haber > dance, portrait and fashion photography > http://www.matthaber.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 1200/vm vs. 1280 ut2
2004-03-27 by Stephen Kobrin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.