A few days ago I posted a message on the EpsonWideForum stating how good face-mounting on plexiglass looked for my 24x36 in photo. The reason that face-mounting looks so good is the look of brilliance and depth that a photo has when bonded to a 1/4 in sheet of clear plexiglass -- quite a different look from framing under glass. Photos framed under glass at certain viewing angles still show some reflection from the print itself in addition to glass refl;ection-- I'm using Semi-Matte paper -- while face-mounted prints are more like looking at the print directly, actually better than looking at the print directly. But face-mounting is expensive I paid $300 including mounting an aluminum sheet on the back and a wooden "box" to allow the picture to be hung looking like it's "floating" on the wall. When I get back to Bangkok in mid-May, I'll probably have a large print laminated and mounted on a 1/2 inch board, which will probably cost about $70. Does anyone know how the face-mounted look compares to a laminated print? And is there a difference in the look of hot-lamination versus cold-lamination? The shop where I have my print face-mounted told me that hot-lamination has a greater look of depth than cold lamination. --Mitch/Potomac, MD
Message
Alternatives to face-mounting on plexiglass?
2004-03-28 by Mitch Alland
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.