Austin Franklin writes: > It has to be a pretty egregious (so many instances, profit from it > etc.) to be considered a crime, and if it isn't, it becomes a civil > matter, which you have to prove damages for...which in > %99.999999999999 of the cases are pretty much nil. In some jurisdictions, even trivial infringements can be prosecuted as criminal acts. In practice, most trivial infringements are not pursued at all, either as civil or criminal matters, but the fact that the law allows one (or both) is something to consider. I follow the Golden Rule for my own respect of copyrights: if I would consider an act to be a significant infringement myself, I take care not to so behave with respect to others. My attitude is middle-of-the-road; I have neither the anal-retentive zeal of an MPAA or RIAA as manifested in their relentless and dogged pursuit of every conceivable infringement (or opportunity for infringement), nor the careless disregard for the intellectual property rights of others often manifested by angry young males in cyberspace as they steal content wholesale for their own use.
Message
Re[4]: [Digital BW] Dealing with Image theft - how not to sell an Epson 4000 :-)
2004-04-01 by Anthony G. Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.