Presumably this conversation so far is about (I assume) one of the varieties of US copyright law. Remember that in European law things have recently changed. In the UK (and, I assume, other European countries - given that this is driven by the EU) the concept of "fair use" has been heavily altered. You cannot now, for example, make a copy of a work for research purposes if there is any commercial motive whatsoever. So, in this case, academic study would be OK, but study by a university in a project that may ultimately give rise to a spin-off company or commercial service would not (at least without clearance). For those of us working in research this a complete PITA. Julian -----Original Message----- From: Editor P.O.V. Image Service [mailto:editor@...] Because, UNLESS the copyright is registered, one must show actual damages.. So, you may have infringement but no $$ with a case that has no registered rights.. There is also the important question for written works of the proportion or percentage of a work copied, even if it qualifies as "fair use".. For a professor, to copy say two lines from a book would be protected, to copy several pages from a book would likely be ok, to copy the entire book and hand it out to students (even for educational purposes) is a clear infringement.. See the Kinko's case. Go read my comments to Paul on "Fair use of images." Ersnt, is probably ok in his translations and postings here as long as he does not translate and post the majority of the article... This list is primarily educational and commentary oriented. Only the YAHOO! component is commercial. Issues of how the end-user uses the information are unimportant BTW. Keith Krebs
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Dealing with Image theft - how not to sell an Epson 4000 :-)
2004-04-02 by Julian Doncaster (Yahoo)
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.