>This list is > primarily educational and commentary oriented. Only the YAHOO! > component is commercial. Issues of how the end-user uses the information > are unimportant BTW. > > Keith Krebs This is not a legal opinion, but I have to strongly disagree with you, Keith, that the "educational and commentary oriented" content of the Yahoo! websites can be separated from the commercial message: wrapping the content with commerce effectively makes the content part of the commercial package. It is exactly like a magazine or newspaper: without the content how much would the advertising space be worth? A whole lot less! is the answer; the content is the ONLY reason many, if not most, of us are here. Would you pay for and read every single advertising flyer that is thrown your way, if it wasn't attached to something of value? Imagine a magazine without the articles or with the articles segregated from the ads, so that you could easily avoid looking at the ads. The value of such a magazine would be rather less than the mixed content version we have now. I, for one, resent this commodifying of my personal communications for the purpose of Yahoo! profits (which retrun nothing to me, but which waste web resources, take up bandwidth and slow my perusal of the content). Newsgroups accomplished the same goal before the medium was commercialized, despite the more complex functionality Yahoo! has added. Frank
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Dealing with Image theft - how not to sell an Epson 4000 :-)
2004-04-02 by njfranknj
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.