Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Genuine Fractals

2004-04-07 by don.swanson

Don't even consider sending off $300.00 until you have checked out:
<http://www.americaswonderlands.com/digital_photo_interpolation.htm#Kneson%2
0(Standard)>
I use Qimage because it appears to be the best without requiring extra
steps.
Make sure that you join all of the parts of the link together.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Davajon [mailto:davajon@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 4:13 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Genuine Fractals


I'm wondering if any of you are using Genuine Fractals.  On the face of it,
the
program sounds good.  Lizard asserts that one can take a small file and
enlarge it withous loss of any kind.  For example, one can take a file that
prints
at 8x10 satisfactorily but at 16x20 is unacceptable and using Genuine
Fractals can enlarge to 16x20 "lossless" or even larger and have the same
sharpness one had at 8x10.  I'm thinking that if the deal sounds to be too
good
to be true it probably isn't true.  I downloaded a trial version and frankly
it
looks good to me.  But, before springing for $300.00, I'd appreciate imput
from
those who may be experienced using the program.  Any thoughts on this
issue?  Thanks in advance.
Joe D.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.