Perhaps a heretical viewpoint: I think it depends on the nature of the image. If you're dealing with direct digital capture, something like GF is probably a necessity if you desire printing at impressive sizes (16x20" and beyond). How much "help" is needed depends on the level of digital capture - a 16x20" print from a file generated by a Canon D30 is quite different from that of an EOS-1Ds (or a Phase One back, for that matter). Genuine Fractals seems to be the de facto commercial standard for the moment, but it is not the only solution readily available. Since I deal almost entirely with 35mm film, I prefer scanning at as high an optical resolution as posiible (without breaking the bank), and outputting/printing with a relative minimum of digital jiggery-pokery, leaving interpolation - by whatever means - as a last resort. Fortunately, as of late last year, the acquisition of a Minolta Dimage Scan Elite 5400 film scanner has brought me a good deal closer to my ideal workflow (and I emphasize that it's simply *my* ideal; there are may roads to a good final result, as can be easily assessed on this Group). In my current 35mm workflow, interpolation is unnecessary up to around 18x25" output; In the rare event where I need to use interpolation, I work with Fred Miranda's Stairstep arrangement via Photoshop, which yields decent results, and, simply in terms of bang-for-the-buck performance, runs rings around Genuine Fractals. - Barrett
Message
Re: Genuine Fractals
2004-04-09 by Barrett Benton
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.