Digital BW, The Print

Thanks for posting your results Ukko.
I've had a 4870 for about a month.
It really is the best bang for the buck in scanners right now.
Cheers,

John Toles
http://www.dragonflyprinting.com/
http://www.dragonflygallery.ca/

On Apr 8, 2004, at 5:03 PM, Ukko Heikkinen wrote:

> Addendum:
>
> Please take a look at
>
> http://www.gnyman.com/Personal/Epson3200vsEpson4870vsCanon9900F.htm
>
> Ukko Heikkinen
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ukko Heikkinen <ukko.heikkinen@...>
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 7:00 PM
> Subject: Vs: [Digital BW] scanner doubts - IMHO Epson 4870
>
>
>> IMHO Epson 4870
>
>> If I scan a 6x6 cm negative on Epson 3200, my reaction is: "That 
>> looks fine, what will I do next?"
>
>> If a scan the same negative on Epson 4870, my reaction is: "That's 
>> it!"