Digital BW, The Print

My apologies to George Nyman.
It is his website review and not Ukko's.

On Apr 9, 2004, at 1:37 AM, Dragonfly Imaging & Printing wrote:

> Thanks for posting your results Ukko.
> I've had a 4870 for about a month.
> It really is the best bang for the buck in scanners right now.
> Cheers,
>
> John Toles
> http://www.dragonflyprinting.com/
> http://www.dragonflygallery.ca/
>
> On Apr 8, 2004, at 5:03 PM, Ukko Heikkinen wrote:
>
>> Addendum:
>>
>> Please take a look at
>>
>> http://www.gnyman.com/Personal/Epson3200vsEpson4870vsCanon9900F.htm
>>
>> Ukko Heikkinen
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Ukko Heikkinen <ukko.heikkinen@...>
>> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 7:00 PM
>> Subject: Vs: [Digital BW] scanner doubts - IMHO Epson 4870
>>
>>
>>> IMHO Epson 4870
>>
>>> If I scan a 6x6 cm negative on Epson 3200, my reaction is: "That 
>>> looks fine, what will I do next?"
>>
>>> If a scan the same negative on Epson 4870, my reaction is: "That's 
>>> it!"
>