cirkutguy writes: > I'm curious as to what information is missing from the color image > that would be in the black and white. Well, it's a long story ... The light in a real-world image consists of a blend of an (essentially) infinite number of frequencies at an infinite number of amplitudes, for every point (pixel) in the image. No capture device is capable of recording an infinite number of amplitudes for an infinite number of frequencies for each pixel, so a great deal of information is discarded when image capture occurs. In a color image, all of the original information is reduced to three numbers, based on a fixed, one-way conversion function. In a black and white image, all of the original information is reduced to one number, using a different conversion function. It's mathematically impossible to reconstruct the original scene information from either B&W or color image captures. Most of the original information is gone, and cannot be recovered. Since both types of capture are functions of the full range of original image information, there is no transformation that can be performed on a given set of image data that will convert it into the image data that would result from a different type of capture. For example, it's intuitively obvious that a color image cannot be reconstructed from a black and white image file. However, it is also true that a black and white image cannot be reconstructed from a color image file. It's possible to produce black and white images the capture of which would be a subset of the function that produced the color images (i.e., in which all information necessary has been preserved), but not anything else. In consequence, there exists an infinite number of black and white images that can only be produced by capturing an original scene directly in black and white with an appropriate monochrome capture method. No manipulation of a color scene can produce these black and white images. In summary: if you want to shoot black and white, you must _capture_ the original image in black and white. Converting color always gives an inferior result. > I too find that I often can't match the look of black and white > film with a color conversion, but have always assumed that some > amount of messing around would do it. You can come close to the look of some black and white films, but you cannot duplicate the look. If you really must have exactly the look of a particular B&W film, you must shoot that film directly. This is even more true if you are using any kind of filters when taking the shots.
Message
Re[2]: [Digital BW] On film
2004-04-11 by Anthony G. Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.