The link doesn´t work exactly. Here is the name of one of a very important book: Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition from Heinz von Förster --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "photographyworks" <photographyworks@y...> wrote: > Sure it is a physicological issue for you and for everyone who > believes-may be in certain moments-that he lives in a physiological > world;-). > Everybody will see what he wants to to see! That´s why marketing is > so important in our society. (Make the visitors of your exhibition > believe that they are looking at the best prints they have ever seen) > If you want to know how I had solved your specific (physiological) > problem, -here is the answer: > I make a testprint (detailed full res)) to check for banding, > sharpness i.e. > But I am sitting down before the screen only when I have the "power" > to maker a print. (Power=emotion=making faults=thinking > paradoxical=and so on.) Than I turn on my tube amplifier and listen > Chet Baker or Patti Smith and I know that I am alive within these > moments. And when the print comes out: WOWWW! What a print I say!! > Sometimes there is banding visible the next day and I am down with > my nerves. But I never will miss what I have felt the day before. > > I can recommend: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/- > /0387953922/qid=1081878524/sr=1- > 1/ref=sr_1_1_xs_stripbooks_i1_xgl14/103-0831820-7091857? > v=glance&s=books > > Hope this helps > Bernard > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "bobphoto" > <bobphoto@a...> wrote: > > After reading all of these thoughful replies, I concur that it may > be psychological and/or physiological but I think it is physical as > well as John suggests. I think when you scale down an image the > detail in the large image spreads out a little bit taking up more > space than it should and thus puts more ink on paper. For all of > these reasons I will make test prints from a section of the image at > full size like I do in the darkroom. > > > > Thanks to all, > > > > Bob > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: John Vitollo > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 11:46 PM > > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Image Density vs. Print Size I'm with > Bob on this one! > > > > > > "bobphoto" wrote: > > > I have come to the conclusion that when making a test print > you have to take a section > > of an image and print it full size rather than re-sizing the > whole image to make a small > > print. > Bob > > > > I'm with Bob on this one! A few weeks ago I did a test print on > my Epson 1200 loaded with > > Fotonics. I wanted to test the new Kodak Ultra paper. I resized > an 8x10 image in > > Photoshop in the Print with Preview down to about 3x4 inches to > place more than one > > image on the paper. The print came out with the black ink area > area all crackled - looks > > like an orange skin - and thought "crap this paper is not > compatible with Fotonics". But > > decided to print a full size image and guess what? Made a fairly > nice image and the black > > areas were not crackled or blocked - had full detail and smooth > surface. > > > > Could be sizing down image increases the resolution to the point > where the printer/driver > > can not handle it. > > > > John V. > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by > visiting this same page. > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier > messages to keep them short. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed > from the membership without notice. > > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of > digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts > may be removed from the membership. > > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules > and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the > group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" > in the Files section: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT > THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP > SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, > SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT > LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR > OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE > POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE > INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; > (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ----------- > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/ > > > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms > of Service. > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Image Density vs. Print Size I'm with Bob on this one!
2004-04-13 by photographyworks
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.