Ah hullo? No I don¹t. I scan with an Imacon 848. A great scan still requires sharpening (as discussed earlier in this thread). The question is: what is the most intelligent means of sharpening and which tools have been developed to make intelligent scanning easier and more efficient? From: "photographyworks" <photographyworks@...> Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:35:43 -0000 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Sharpening vs. Print size [was: Image Density vs. Print Size] If you have a great greyscale scan, sharpen with PS, if it isn´t a great greyscale scan, throw it away therefor you do not have to sharpen it. Look at Unwerth´s photographs! She never knows anything about photography, but what crazy prints!!! You know what I mean? Bernard from Austria [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Sharpening vs. Print size [was: Image Density vs. Print Size]
2004-04-13 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.