Hi Sandy, which GretagMacbeth system are you using? Ed R. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sanfo2003" <SandyCornelius@c...> wrote: > Purchased the new R800 from Epson. Only printed BW so far on EEM > using Windows. Tried printing using "monochrome" and results were > disappointing to say the least. Print came out so cold it was almost > blue. Downloaded the Gregtag Macbeth profiles included on the > supplied CD and printed a 2.2 gamma greyscale 21 step/gradient using > color management and Relative Colormetric rendering with BP > compensation OFF at the "Best Photo" setting. Greyscale was neutral > but blocked up over 85% black. Tried again, this time with BP > compensation ON and got a neutral wedge but blocked up over 90% > black. Tried again with BP compensatin ON with Perceptual rendering > and voila, a beautifully neutral greyscale with every 5% wedge > discernable from 0 to 100% and a nice smooth gradient. I was ready. > > Printed some files and results were excellent, and I mean fine art > quality excellent. Metamerism was less than 10% of that on my 2200. > You have to really know what you're looking for to even see it, in > fact I had to rapidly move the print back and forth between daylight > and tungsten to see it. You could sell prints from this printer at an > outdoor venue (art fair) and be confident that the print will appear > the same when taken home and viewed under incandescent lighting; that > is, if you were shown the print cold in either daylight or tungsten > you would not see any metamerism, in my opinion. > > I have the ability to make a custom profile at home with some pretty > fancy equipment/software but don't think I'll bother, that's how good > the included profiles are. > > I then converted a greyscale file to duotone in Photoshop and > customized an ever so slight tint application thru the duotone > curves. Out came a print exactly like on my screen with no unwanted > hue changes across tones. Tried a heavier tint and results were the > same. Its because of the lack of metamerism in tinted prints that > obviously use all inks that makes me think there's something > different about these inks that minimizes metamerism, and that its > not all in the driver. > > If it sounds like I'm enthusiastic about this printer, well I am, and > I haven't even printed color yet with the gloss optimizer. Clearly > the downside of the printer is its small size. But here we have a > printer that prints archival fine art quality BW out of the box, > prints color glossy without bronzing (gloss optimizer), has increased > gamut, no need to swap out cartridges when switching between photo > and matte black inks, and I can drive down to the local store to get > more ink when I need it (major manufacturer distribution). > > Put this technology in a 7600-type printer, and wow, put me on the > waiting list!
Message
Re: Epson R800 BW results
2004-04-15 by edrudolpho
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.