> From: Ukko Heikkinen [mailto:ukko.heikkinen@...] > > I was surprised the other day when I saw a poster of an image by > Ansel Adam of (I believe) > Mt McKinley (?). The skies really were a deep deep black. Also > I just read yesterday the > small section in his Book 1 The Camera re the use of filters, > particularly the reference to > using a No. 25 (A) Red filter for strong contrast in landscape > photography. And so I > turned back to one of my favourite images taken in the Grand > Teton National Park and > how I had previously ranked and weighted the Red, Green and Blue > (and Luminosity) layers > when converting to B&W. Specifically, I found that to approach > the massive punch I saw in > the Adams print I had to use the Red layer as my base at 100%, > with only slight if any use > of the Green and no use of the Blue layer. Try pushing red past 100%, setting green to zero, and making blue negative by the same amount (e.g., 130% and -30%). That's something you can't even approximate with filters. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul mailto:pderocco@...
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Filters and their split channels "equivalents"
2004-04-18 by Paul D. DeRocco
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.