Digital BW, The Print

Richard, see recent thread "Serious quadtone printing". Your situiation is 
exactly one of the points I was trying to make.
Doesn't sound like your in a position to try something that "might" work. The 
2000? forget it. You best bet and probably least expensive would be the 1280. 
Lots of users and several quad workflows to go with it.
We all have thrown good many after bad, and your go for broke mentality is 
not inappropriate at all.
Can you get an 1160?
Steve M.
In a message dated 4/24/2004 10:32:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
r.smallfield@... writes:

> Hi,
> I posted a message entitled 'Two possibly terminal 1200 clogs' - but perhaps 
> my subject line was misleading. 
> 
> I had some specific questions, but the subject probably put people off. 
> 
> I repeat the questions here:
> 1. Would the UT1 inks work in an 1160 if two of the inks were removed?
> 2. I have seen a 2000P advertised 2nd hand - and gather that it *might* work 
> with these inks ... any thoughts? Mind you, second-hand printers have always 
> led to more trouble than they're worth for me, having had three of them.
> 
> But I'm tempted to go for broke and get a 2100 - there comes a time when you 
> have to quit messing about and get things to your clients on time if you 
> want to have any business at all.
> 
> Richard
> --
> http://smallfield.vze.com
> http://photos.smallfield.vze.com
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]