Digital BW, The Print

In a message dated 4/25/2004 7:25:22 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
richcontaxg@... writes:

> Anyone out there tried this stuff as a more accurate proofer to PR
> than EEM?
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Richard               mailto:richard@...
> 
Richard, I've been using it for the last few days, YES it is a lot more 
accurate than EEM.
It prints very acurate to PhotoRag, and Turner. You could sell the prints 
except its painfully thin, see through even. I plan on using it regularly. Across 
the board its 1/2 the price of the real Hanna papers. Its amazing that this 
paper can take the ink being so thin but it can. Did I say its  Thin, ;0) It 
shows how crappy EEM really is. BW printing of course, probably equal in color 
though. Only suitable for accurate proofing. Not sure if its the type of proof 
you would show clients(too flimsy) but great for getting an accurate density 
contrast check as well as tone before going to finals on the thick stuff. Dmax 
is equal to photorag.
Steve Meyers



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]