Thank you to everyone who replied to my message -- this is exactly the discussion I was hoping for. For a variety of reasons I've decided that I'm not prepared for all the control a RIP will provide, but I'd still like the ability to tweak an existing profile to account for variances in paper batches or the unique characteristics of my printer, for example. About a year and a half ago I used the Curves Template located in the Files section (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/Ima ge%20Processing/) to create a Photoshop adjustment layer but I believe this spreadsheet does a strictly mathematical linearization. I'm hoping to do something similar (i.e. measure the density values in a stepwedge, compare to some Aims and make an adjustment curve) but would like to account for perceptual issues. I'll see what I can figure out with the Bruce Lindbloom calculators. Thanks again for your insight (and if you have any hints, I'm all ears!). Peter. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter" <spamme2001@m...> wrote: > Is linearization supposed to be determined strictly > mathematically or is there some element of perceptual > linearization involved?
Message
Re: Linearization - mathematical or perceptual?
2004-04-26 by Peter
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.