Happy with 20% here too, I just run into occassional problems with files from other sources. Some untagged, some from people with bad monitors, some with proofs printed on bad or unprofiled systems. Have you tried the softproof method nailed down for the i1 by Roy and Carl? Works quite well. Tyler --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Amadou Diallo" <amadiallo2001@y...> wrote: > >This is a little > > outside my color geek range, so for now I've settled on 20%, and work > > in a 20% dot gain space, so far so good. I'm curious what Amadou and > > others are using. > > Tyler > > Tyler, > I too use the 20% dot gain adjustment in StudioPrint (it's the default). Printing a stepwedge > I can distinguish paper white from 2% ink and between 98% and 100% K. I have set up a PS > grayscale working space of gamma 2.0. I find this gets me a good screen to print match. > Of course you could go the other way and adjust dot gain in StudioPrint to match your PS > gamma, but I was happy with the print contrast at 20% and so decided to bring the > monitor in line. > > amadou diallo
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Linearization - mathematical or perceptual?
2004-04-27 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.