Digital BW, The Print

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the info, but this is getting worse not better =(

I thought UT was the predecessor to UT2, and therefore was a 6-ink 
set that's older than either the Bowhaus inkset for the 2200 or 
Paul's UT7 inkset. MIS still list it as an option for the 1280:

http://www.inksupply.com/index.cfm?source=html/ut1280.html

Ah well, it's not really an issue to me right now anyway, although it 
would seem sensible to get things straight once and for all -- this 
area is pretty confusing for newbies as it is, without throwing extra 
uncertainty into the mix.

-= mike =-

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel Staver" 
<daniel@p...> wrote:
> > As you can see, it clearly groups the Bowhaus config under UT7, 
> > whereas judging by your message below and many of the discussions 
in 
> > this group, it seems that most people regard UT7 as being Paul's 
> > inkset only. Maybe it's worth asking MIS to amend the page?
> 
> It seems they've renamed their inksets so that both configurations 
for
> the 2200 are now called UT7. The Bowhaus configuration used to be 
called
> just UT while the Roark configuration was announced as UT7, which 
is why
> most people here think of that as being Paul's inkset only.
> 
> --
> Daniel Staver
> http://daniel.staver.no