--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John K. Stacy" <stacyj@j...> wrote: > Hi Roger, > > I think we are confusing our personal tastes and opinions with "art" or "quality". A few years ago I attended a show at the Decordova Museum of Modern Art in Massachusetts of photography from National Geographic. Many people consider Nat Geo to have some of the consistently best photography in the world and they've published many successful "coffee table" books of their photography. But I've met, talked with, or taken workshops from their photo editor and several of their photographers and I know that they regard themselves as PJ's. So what do people here think of NatGeo photography - art or PJ?
Message
Re: In defense of "Not Ansel"
2004-04-28 by Peter Nelson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.