--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "tigertwous" <jfisher@s...> wrote: > I don't contest a word you have said, in fact I agree with you, however, when it comes > to film flatness this is where the Imacon system really shows where it excels over > other systems. Well I agree that would certainly be an issue. I often shoot 6x7 and that's a huge issue with flatness of 6x7 MF in the camera - there's a whole world of folklore and opinion about how to get good film flatness, including not shooting film that's been in the camera for than X amount of time, controlling studio humidity, vacuum backs, stopping way down, etc. But I've seen enough scans that were right down to the grain so I didn't think this was a big issue with most scanners unless the film was badly buckled or something. I'll be buying a new scanner soon because I'm getting a new PC and my existing scanners are all SCSI and I want to go to just USB2 or Firewire. So what do people think - is MF film flatness a big problem with most scanners these days?
Message
Re: comments on the Epson scanners vs. the Nikon 8000
2004-05-03 by Peter Nelson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.