Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: comments on the Epson scanners vs. the Nikon 8000

2004-05-03 by Peter Nelson

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "tigertwous" 
<jfisher@s...> wrote:
> I don't contest a word you have said, in fact I agree with you, 
however, when it comes 
> to film flatness this is where the Imacon system really shows 
where it excels over 
> other systems.

Well I agree that would certainly be an issue.   I often shoot 6x7 
and that's a huge issue with flatness of 6x7 MF in the camera -  
there's a whole world of folklore and opinion about how to get good 
film flatness, including not shooting film that's been in the camera 
for than X amount of time, controlling studio humidity, vacuum 
backs, stopping way down, etc.  

But I've seen enough scans that were right down to the grain so I 
didn't think this was a big issue with most scanners unless the film 
was badly buckled or something.

I'll be buying a new scanner soon because I'm getting a new PC and 
my existing scanners are all SCSI and I want to go to just USB2 or 
Firewire.   So what do people think -  is MF film flatness a big 
problem with most scanners these days?

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.