Hi Sanders, Are you saying that since the Epson doesn't produce as sharp an image you f= avor it sometimes? sort of like putting vaseline on a lense for some special appli= cations? :~) Scott > > Truer words were never spoken. I scan 120 Tri-X (shot at EI 200 and > developed in Rodinal 1:100) with an Epson 3200 and a Microtek Artixscan 1= 20tf. The > > But If I'm scanning a portrait or a figure study, the Epson flatbed wins = > hands down every time. It produces a slightly more diffuse image, and sm= oother > skin tones. It might not be as clinically sharp as the Microtek, but tha= t's not > > > Sanders McNew > www.mcnew.net > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: comments on the Epson scanners vs. the Nikon 8000
2004-05-04 by Scott Graham