From one with 25+ years of conventional wet darkroom B&W experience in both 35mm and medium format, 2 months experience scanning and photoshoping negatives, and 6 months experience with digital cameras..... Bottom line - today a real B&W scanned negative will beat a 6mp digital image by about 10%. With an 8mp camera the advantage drops to 5%. With an 11mp camera the advantage is gone. By advantage I mean sharpness, resolution, and tone control. Assuming: you have an excellent B&W negative from a very good camera/lens with perfect zone system control exposure, outstanding development chemistry, a top quality scanner, and tons of patience, experience and time to master negative scanning. Also assuming you are making prints bigger than 8x10. I studied negative scanning for months and followed hundred of Internet BBS discussions by people sharing techniques for overcoming the problems of scanning B&W negatives. All scanners are engineered to scan color and do a poor job with B&W (they don't do a very good job with color either), so people have come up with hundreds of "tips" on how to overcome the problems inherint in scanning negatives. But the major roadblock for me was time. It takes forever to scan negatives. My brief experients with scanning B&W (and color) negs showed that no one process worked for all negs. Each neg required different settings to get the optimum scan. So, a 4 to 7 minute scan for the first attempt, followed by 2 or 3 more scans of the same neg to find the "sweet spot" followed by lots of photoshop time to clean up the dust spots and other small imperfections. Then you are at the starting point of a digital camera image where you can begin the "creative" process of adjusting tone, contrast, etc. So I decided to put the scanner money into digital cameras instead, and have not regretted the decision. The scanner stays around for the low probablilty I will need to scan and print something from a 25 year file of negatives. But the digital camera B&W process has it's problems too. The biggest problem for me is too many choices. I've collected about 7 "techniques" for converting the color digital image to B&W. That control, plus selective masking (dodging and burning) in Photoshop means I can review hundreds of "versions" of a B&W image in a few minutes. Sometimes I go crazy trying to decide. In the wet darkroom I could use a few different contrast filters and my magic wand for very limited dodging and burning to see 4 or 5 different versions of a print in a couple of hours.
Message
Re: Film vs Digital Capture
2004-05-12 by crown_red
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.