I'm mainly hoping Roy and Paul can shed some light on this, but if anyone else wants to jump in, please feel free. I've been looking at Roy's very interesting scans of prints, posted in the thread "Dots and More Dots". I must admit, I'm slightly surprised by the differences. On my monitor, the images measure 4"x4", so that's a 16x enlargement factor relative to the physical print. That means that viewing the screen from 8ft away is like looking at the print itself from 6", which is about as close as I can focus with my naked eye. What I'm surprised by is the fact that there is such a difference in visible dot between the 2200/UT7 print and the 1270/UT2+1160/VM prints, especially against the UT2 prints as I thought the inkset used a very similar set of grey tones to UT7. If anything, I would've expected the 2200 print to be finer due to the smaller drop size, but instead the reverse is true. The difference is clear at an effective 6in viewing distance and still noticeable at 8-12in, so this would definitely be a concern to me in a real print. Any idea what gives? TIA -= mike =-
Message
Understanding dots and dots
2004-05-25 by mike_nunan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.