jnhugo wrote: > >If you are hired as a freelance agent then you are producing a work >for hire >product for the people who hired you > In the US that is true ONLY if they explicitly or by direct reference incorporate the term "work-for-hire" in a written contract. Can't tell you how many clients forget to do that.. I let them write the final contract up and simply review the terms. When they do forget it, I don't cut them a break (except in the rarest of circumstances where I may lose a large recurring contract), since the rule of law is "ambiguity goes against the drawer." In such cases, I make sure I register the copyright immediately after the shoot. AND, I can always use the extra cash that comes from selling them back the copyright.. LOL Under copyright law, by actual definition, a photographer is an artist not a technician. Don't let anyone convince you otherwise.. When you do so, it lessens your inherent $$ value. Keith Krebs "Just some guy," caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo Publications), at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/ and the Multiverse's largest Canon printer User Community at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon-printers "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together guys"
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: who gets credit?
2004-05-25 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.