Interesting Epson told me to leave mine on, to save ink from excess cleaning cycles on start up. Said the head is just as protected on as off. A bit early to tell, but my new 4000 seems to clean after a while idle anyway. Scott --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@p...> wrote: > Hi... as I've said before in this group, I'm new to the world of digital b&w printing. > Just a reminder to those who don't recognize my name :-) > > I've been happily printing with UT7 on a 2200 for a couple of weeks now. Tonight, I > made a print that was unexpectedly high in contrast and was quite yellow too. Sort of > a split-toned effect with its blacks being blue. I tried another image, one that I'd > printed last week, and got the same result, so did a nozzle check. > > The light cyan cart appeared to be completely absent, so I did a series of head > cleanings and nozzle checks.... which brings me to my question. > > I expected the checks to get progressively better with each cleaning cycle, but they > didn't. Rather, the clogged head would get better, I'd get a near perfect check, run > one more cleaning cycle, and suddenly another color would be partially missing. In > this erratic way, after 6 or 7 cycles, I finally got a good nozzle check. Is this sort of > clogging behavior normal? What might it indicate? And is this a good time to ask for > a link to procedures that may minimize clogging. For example, I've been leaving my > printer on. However, I've just returned and received a replacement for an R800 > because of an unclearable clog and during this process Epson tech support advised > me to always turn the printer off, even if out of use for as little as 20 minutes. So I > began applying that principle to the 2200 as well. Perhaps turning it off precipitated > this clog? > > any comments, advice, links, etc., appreciated > Ed
Message
Re: Clogging behavior
2004-05-29 by Scott Graham
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.