I can't say I'm all that enamored with either one. So I probably ought to think about it some more. BTW, I've always used just the 21step for softproofing. Roy --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> wrote: > Agreed. Although I am surprised you prefer the look of the second curve. > The slope of the curve (gamma) has been dramatically flattened and an image > will look washed out and lack contrast. Put another way, the whole image > has been brightened so that the image detail at the margin can be restored. > In the former, the tonal relationships are preserved as much as possible > but yes there is loss of shadow and highlight detail because it is beyond > the scope of the ink-media combination. I am also not sure how the > mid-point is affected in the second scenario. That is, is the curve > straight or curved around a stable 50-50 midpoint? I will bet that most > people when confronted with the second scenario when soft-proofing end up > applying an s-curve that deepens the dark areas of the print and lightens > the lighter areas in effect making the resultant combined affect of the > image much closer to the former scenario (test this by doing the second and > then altering this curve until you are happy with the look of the image > again.) Personally, I would find it an easier workflow to have the former > happen....highlight and shadow detail gets clipped to reflect the minimum > dmax of the paper and maximum dmax of 100% black. I could then decide how > much I was prepared to lighten the image and lower contrast to restore some > of the detail at the margin. Anyway, food for thought..... > > From: "Roy Harrington" <roy@h...> > > You can get an idea of the differences with a few small PS experiments. > Take a nice full range B&W image. Go into adjust curves. > Drag the 0,0 point to 10,10 and drag 100,100 to 80, 80 > You ought to have a horizontal lines from 10,10 to the edge and > 80,80 to the edge. This is the change you are proposing. Click Preview on > and off to see the changes. Shadows and Highlights > are clipped but the mid range stays the same. Now move the points out to > the edge along the horizontal lines. The > Input values will now be 0 and 100. This shows the other way. It > lightens the picture but there is no clipping. Its a personal choice which > you like, but my tendency is to go with the > readjustment to avoid clipping. > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
[Digital BW] Re: QTR Question for Roy
2004-07-08 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.