Digital BW, The Print

John: it may be because Bob Zeiss at MIS and Paul Roark come with a
lot of credibility for many of us. Pretty much, across the board, they
both have been real straight shooters, no vaporware, and no products
that just don't work like they should. What few product problems MIS
has have had have been openly acknowledged and replacements made. 

Paul is independent enough for me. He doesn't do this for money. 

Now could they both be wrong as far as projectimg longevity? Possibly,
but so could Wilhelm. But I believe they are giving us honest
information. I trust both of them for that. And I can't say that about
everyone in that business. 

Bob Michaels

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean"
<deanwork2003@y...> wrote:
> Does anyone have reliable info on the true permanence o UT7 
> pigment inkset by MIS? 
> 
> So, why does't MIS hire  a reputable testing facility or two? 
> Please don't tell me it cost too much. This is their responsibility 
> and it has to be factored in.
> 
> Bottom line is why should anyone trust their internal tests? In 
> terms of years, what DOES  their internal testing data reveal? 
> And, yes equiveliency in years of permance does matter to my 
> clients.