First of all my comment was not offered or intended as an assessment or evaluation of BO printing. In fact it was a second and minor point. Since most of the "BO" emails in the past "seemed" so hostile, I usually just skipped over the "BO" postings. Of all the folks on this list I am the last to be concerned with or care about how anyone makes a print, except that I may get new ideas. I apologize to all BO printers that due to my neglect of BO subject lines I was unaware that this issue was previously dismissed as false. As halftone prints, I assumed (obviously incorrectly) that any one color print would not have the subtlety of a duotone, tritone or quadtone print. I will search the archives for the explanation. Wendel >Clayton Wrote: > > All I am trying to do, in my replies to statements like Wendel's, is > to keep BO printing from sliding back into the pariah status it once > suffered under. BO printing offers some attributes which may or may > not appeal to the user, like any other system. Its viability is > evidenced by the fact that it is the preferred method of many people.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital Capture for BO printing
2004-07-26 by Wendel White
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.