It's not all about file size. I've made several 35x46 quad prints from scanned 35mm negs, and they look fine. If you made a silver print that big it would have the same image qualities, probably a bit softer from the enlarging lens. They were from drum scans at 4000dpi, with a 6 micron aperture. THis doesn't make all the large of a file from 35mm, but in fact it's sampling as much or more detail than the film can resolve (depending on the film), so a bigger file doesn't really have more information. For big prints it becomes a matter of scaling up, possibly sharpening a hair at print size (only for grain definition, not image), some methods work better than others, and may be image dependant to a degree. I understand Qimage is very good at it, but PC only. Tyler
Message
Re: Resolution requirements for _BIG_ prints
2004-08-11 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.