Thanks everyone for the input and advice. Especially for that ScanCalc tool - it's quite helpful since it really does account for viewing distance. I'm curious as to the formula(e) being used, though. Here's what I'm thinking I'll try: 35mm frames scanned on my Nikon IV (pushing it a bit at 2900 dpi, but according to the ScanCalc program I should be able to get all the way out to 65"x44" at a 3' viewing distance. We'll see how accurate that is...) 120 frames scanned on an Epson 3200, at 1600dpi and 3200 dpi. both formats drum scanned (assuming work will pay for that service for me to test). I will try both negatives and slides, just for the heck of it. I'll use Qimage for all the printing and interpolation, since I'm familiar with it. The only question is how much RAM will be enough for all these scenarios. I have no doubt we can get at least 1GB in there, but I'd like to get 2GB or even more. thanks again, allan ------------------ Technology Projects Manager Academic Computing & The Office of Accessible Education Stanford University v - 650-996-0546 f - 650-725-4685
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Resolution requirements for _BIG_ prints
2004-08-11 by Allan Chen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.