Carl Schofield developed an ICC-based soft proofing method that is fantastic if you a Gretag Eye-One device. > From: gulstenek <keving@...m> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 05:48:14 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Soft Proof Alternatives > > I'm renovating my workflow and I'm looking for better ways to approach > soft proofing. > > Right now I create custom dot gain curves using Tylers instructions. > I use a spread sheet found in the files section to calculate the dot > percent from the density measurements of a 21 step wedge. I save the > file without embedding any profiles and use the soft-proof feature of > photoshop when working on the image. With a calibrated monitor this > works really well. If I only had one ink/paper/printer combination > I'd leave it the way it is. > > However, there are small differences in the soft proof profiles for > each of the paper/ink/printer combinations. If I want to print the > same image on different papers I need to add another adjustment layer > and go through another print/proof cycle. > > Two alternative approaches have come to mind. > > 1. If I can create a custom dot gain curve for the soft proof is it > not possible to use the same density measurement to create an > adjustment curve for each ink/paper/printer combination leave the > image in some common space like gray 2.2 and apply the curve just > before printing? > > 2. Can I just leave the image in some common space ( gray 2.2 ) and > use "convert to profile" with the custom dot gain curves as the target > space? > > These two approaches seem like a color-management-lite approach but > still have the advantage of having one 'master' file with different > children for different ink/paper/printer output options. > > Does this make sense? Are there better options? I know these > approaches don't handle tones at all but I'm OK with that. How do > people who proof with EEM and print on HPR manage this issue? > > As always, thanks for your help. > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership > without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the > membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and > Moderators. See ³Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines² in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE ³OWNER² AND > ³MODERATORS² OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, > USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE ³OWNER² AND ³MODERATORS² OF > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR > TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Soft Proof Alternatives
2004-08-18 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.