--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Cleavis" <lyonscox@m...> wrote: > Martin, > > > I scan in 16-bit and do general levels and curve adjustments before > > moving to 8-bit. This way the adjustments in 8-bit will not be as > > extreme and fewer tones dropped. > > > snip > > > > Give this a try and then print both the 16 and 8-bit images and see > > if there is a difference in the final print. > > > Hhhmmm, it seems I can only print in 8-bit. Curves and Levels are > basically the only tool available in 16-bit. No dodge/burn in 16- > bit, which I'm accustomed to being a tradition B&W printer at heart. > > 16-bit just not seeming that useful...? Cleavis, There has been a lot of discussion around this point both pro and con. You have nothing to lose by making initial levels and curves adjustments in 16-bit and those adjustments in 8-bit can lead to "posterizing" the image if the adjustments become too drastic. Local burning and dodging in 8-bit do not present that risk. My own feeling is that 16-bit is probably overkill for B&W and that 8- bit is marginal. 10 or 12-bit would have been just fine but we will live with 8-bit for a lot of our adjustments until Adobe gives us full 16-bit functionality. Go ahead and work in 8-bit. The odds are that you will not encounter any serious problems but keep 16-bit in mind if you run into trouble with a problem or marginal negative. Martin Wesley
Message
Re: Scanning to Printing...
2001-10-29 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.