>Many sizes, depending on the image shape, but not the in my view >long A sizes. While it was my choice when I printed 35mm in the >past (as a student). But that was more a cost aspect, it filled >the size well with small margins. With wider margins around the >image the A sizes become problematic, the image shape gets even >longer than the 35 mm (or close to 6x9) aspect ratio is. And I'm >not doing panoramas (yet) so it isn't my choice.... etc only so if you insist on playing with miniature cameras:-) I'm glad photo paper still comes in sensible sizes that relate to 4x5 and 8x10 (but that inkjet paper sure is a pain then - you waste a heck of a lot of 13x19 paper...) I'm still sad we got rid of full-plate and mammoth-plate sizes though.... tim
Message
RE: OT - U.S vs. Europe paper sizes
2004-09-20 by Tim Atherton
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.