--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jay Gladwell" <jaygladwell@h...> wrote: > Peter-- > > Being one who is still trying to determine which route to follow, you bring > to bear my biggest concern. Based on the reality of what you're saying > about mixed-color inksets, isn't the logical choice using inksets that use > only blacks and grays? The "logical" choice is the one that best meets each individual's priorities. The benefit of a RIP is that you can use the same printer to make both color and black and white prints, and you can also make prints that are predominantly black and white with one small detail or splash that's in color. A RIP is also simpler because you don't need to buy third-party inks, refillers, special hardware drivers, or a separate dedicated printer. On the hand, I personally find quad/hex -tone prints to be more neutral, smoother, and "photographic" -looking than RIP prints. You given us mixed signals about your priorities, saying both that you're a perfectionist AND that you want it simple. There is nothing that will neet both needs so you have to bite the bullet and PRIORITIZE. Your priorities will determine your "logical choice".
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Tungsten Balance of Epson Archivals
2004-09-23 by Peter Nelson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.