Digital BW, The Print

Peter--

So you're saying there's no such thing as simple perfection. Humm... if 
that's true, then I guess I'll have to rethink some things.

Thanks!

Jay


>From: "Peter Nelson" <pnweb@...>
>Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Tungsten Balance of Epson Archivals
>Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:47:21 -0000
>
>--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jay Gladwell"
><jaygladwell@h...> wrote:
> > Peter--
> >
> > Being one who is still trying to determine which route to follow,
>you bring
> > to bear my biggest concern.  Based on the reality of what you're
>saying
> > about mixed-color inksets, isn't the logical choice using inksets
>that use
> > only blacks and grays?
>
>The "logical" choice is the one that best meets each individual's
>priorities.
>
>The benefit of a RIP is that you can use the same printer to make
>both color and black and white prints, and you can also make prints
>that are predominantly black and white with one small detail or
>splash that's in color.   A RIP is also simpler because you don't
>need to buy third-party inks, refillers, special hardware drivers,
>or a separate dedicated printer.    On the hand, I personally find
>quad/hex -tone prints to be more neutral, smoother,
>and "photographic" -looking than RIP prints.
>
>You given us mixed signals about your priorities, saying both that
>you're a perfectionist AND that you want it simple.   There is
>nothing that will neet both needs so you have to bite the bullet and
>PRIORITIZE.  Your priorities will determine your "logical choice".
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Don\ufffdt just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/