Peter wrote: "So if there were one method that was both simple and perfect why would we need five methods?" Peter - This is art. Perfection is in the eye of the beholder. And, considering that there are a few thousand 'beholders' on this list, I don't understand why we don't have more (perfect) ways of doing this. Tom Baker [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Tungsten Balance of Epson Archivals
2004-09-24 by Tom Baker