Daniel Staver writes: > Using a firewall is a good idea, but that is besides the point. What you > said was that it's impossible for a virus to infect a computer without > human interaction and that's not true. One can configure a computer to welcome outside attacks, but that should not be the default configuration. > Even with a firewall it could still happen that a service on one of your > open ports had a security hole in it and that a virus used that > vulnerability to infect your machine. There aren't any open ports leading to any listening services on my desktop. > Another example is the recent JPEG vulnerability recently discovered > in windows which could leave you open to attack just by viwing a > web-page with a JPEG image on it. I guess this could technically be > decribed as user interaction, but viewing images online was previously > thought to be safe behaviour even by security experts. It still requires interaction, although this particular problem is irritatingly pervasive. C has been around for forty years or so; are there still programmers so incompetent that they never check for buffer overflows?
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Windows XP Service Pack 2
2004-09-25 by Anthony G. Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.