Steve Schaefer wrote: >I was wondering if anyone has done an A-B comparison between >Photoshops 10% Bicubic >interpolation verses Photoshops Camera Raw plug-in. I am about to >print several digital >files large and am curious about the best way to do the interpolation. > >Also if there is a third party product out there that you think does >a better job than >photoshop I am interested in hearing about that also, especially if >you have done a side by >side comparison of all three methods. > >Thanks > >Steve > > > Qimage maybe? The Pyramid interpolation is said to be very good. -- Hans Van Rafelghem http://www.vanrafelghem.com/ http://www.pbase.com/hvr_oosterzele
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 10% Bicubic verses Camera Raw plug-in interpolation
2004-09-25 by Hans Van Rafelghem