Well note that up until recently the portable solutions for the Leaf and Phase One digital backs were a PDA and Sony Vaio computer respectively. What I found was that desktop replacement notebooks are really heavy (except the Apple PBs which are arguably less powerful). Lugging a camera system is enough of a chore. You will very likely find a light 12in with reasonable CPU more than enough for viewing/downloading photos on the road. As for the workhorse computer, I still think you will find a considerable difference with twin 64 bit processors.... > From: Sam McCandless <samcc@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:03:19 -0700 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: desktop-replacement notebooks (was Re: [Digital BW] QTR/OSX/7600 > -- upgrade report) > > > It does help, Steve. But my prospective desktop-replacement notebook > would have a generation's advantage over your actual notebook. So I > have to wonder how much difference it makes if both the speed of the > notebook's processor and the amount of RAM in it are roughly doubled > and a faster hard drive is substituted? Maybe quite a bit; I believe > notebook RAM can now approach Photoshop's limit even after the OS > takes up a large chunk. > > I hope someone on the list with such a killer notebook - Mac or > Windows - can comment on it's Photoshop performance within a 16-bit > workflow. > > Steve's second point, that a lesser notebook would do for the digital > camera's traveling companion, I'm still mulling over. That's > intriguing partly because it might be enough less to actually carry > around with the camera. Couldn't a really light 12-inch notebook do > for this role? > -- > Sam
Message
Re: desktop-replacement notebooks (was Re: [Digital BW] QTR/OSX/7600 -- upgrade report)
2004-10-05 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.