I have had some images of trees that look, in color, like backgrounds for film animations; one image from the Quinault rain forest looks like a background for "Bambi". This is true both for the screen image and the print. When examined in detail they look like photos, but the overall effect is of a very detailed cartoon. The images are 8 or 16bit RGB scans of medium format Kodak & Fuji color negatives and I remember having seen the effect on some images over several years with different films and scanners. I've seen the effect with Vuescan on a ScanMultiPro and ScanMaker4 and also with ScanWizard on the SM4. I also have some scans from a PowerLook 3000, but I haven't examined them for this effect. I wonder if it could be some kind of subtle posterization effect. I see it in images that show nice smooth histograms and more heavily manipulated ones that are a bit "combed", so I don't think it is a defect in my processing. Nothing I have been able to do to the images has reduced the effect - all suggestions welcomed. Frank --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bernie Ess" <albatros-@g...> wrote: > > Hi, > Having printed quite a lot these days on my 2100/UT7 I found that > certain gray tones are difficult for me to print in a satisfying way: > > It is foliage of trees. I like to shoot trees, but it often happens > that it gets a kind of "painterly" effect later in the print, it looks > more like a painting than really like a photo. Of course it is not a > lack of detail, but its the tones. Have you experienced that? > I even find it hard to well convert trees from color (digital) to b&w. > But also when I scan film (120 film) I often find that the foliage is > the most difficult part to adjust. Strange enough, skin tones in b&w > are far more easy to do (in color that would be different of course). > > Regards, Bernhard
Message
Re: Difficult grey tones to print
2004-10-15 by njfranknj
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.