Digital BW, The Print

I don't see any metamerism in my prints, and I have had experts look at them who don't 
see any either.

However, many people in these groups have told me that I do see metamerism.

Hard to tell somedays who to believe.
:))  
 
On the other hand, human vision has a wide variation in sensitivities...

Would be  happy to sell you a print.
Scott

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Scott Rowed" <scott_rowd@y...> 
wrote:
> 
> Thanks Scott,
> 
> The Canon 6200 uses pigment inks so the fading shouldn't be a 
> problem. If there were just a way to get rid of the metamerism...
> 
> I'll look more seriously at the 4000.
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Scott Graham" 
> <gebilwil@n...> wrote:
> > 
> > The 4000 will definitely do both color and fine B&W with the std 
> inks, drivers and papers.
> > 
> > I'm not sure which inks the Canon 6200 uses, but I would be very 
> careful.  On one of these 
> > groups there is a recent thread on fading of Canon dye inks.  It 
> happens very quickly.
> > 
> > Scot
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Scott Rowed" 
> <scott_rowd@y...> 
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'm a newbie at this so I hope some of the more experienced 
> users 
> > > can guide me in the right direction.
> > > 
> > > I need to print high-quality BW in at least 16" wide, preferably 
> > > 24". Ideally I'd like to have a printer that would do both BW 
> and 
> > > color, but failing that I'd dedicate a printer to BW and have an 
> > > outside lab do the color.
> > > 
> > > Is the Epson 4000 a viable option for both BW and color? The 
> size is 
> > > on the bottom end of what I'm looking for, but it might do. Or 
> > > should I just forget the color and look for something like a 
> used 
> > > Epson 7000 or 7500 and set it up with BW inks such as MIS or 
> others?
> > > 
> > > Has anyone had any luck with the Canon W6200 for BW? It produces 
> > > great color with reasonable ink costs, but the BW results I've 
> seen 
> > > so far exhibit metamerism.
> > > 
> > > Thanks.