Amen, Epson wants to replace Kokak as the domanant force in photography and with that goes a lot of responsibility. They were pushed along by all these companies you mentioned and contiune to be, thank God. As far as media goes, I think they want to do the right thing after some serious stumbles along the way. Because selling media and ink is what they are all about. I am wondering what people out here think of the Ultrasmooth rag? I personally, as a one who had settled on several Hahnemuhle papers, find this media quite nice. What I really like about it is its durability and lack of obs. It appers that Premier Fine Art rag is the same paper. I believe Paul Roark uses it with his UT inks a lot. Does anyone know yet who is making these papers? It seems to be a big secret and Epson and their distributors won't say anything. But, those who have profiled the two say they respond to color profiles almost exactly. John ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Without third party competition for the consumables market, we wouldn't > be having this conversation. Without Media Street, MIS, Cone, Lyson, > Hawk Mtn., Hahnemuhle, Futures, and many, many other companies, > innovation would drop to a crawl, and users like me would have thrown > their 1270s in the trash and returned to the darkroom. > > Blaming the users is not the answer. Competing manufacturers (third > party or OEM) making better products, bringing them to market, and > competing for market share is. >
Message
Epson and their competition
2004-10-27 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.