Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: glossy paper goose chase....maybe R800?

2004-10-28 by cschaible94111

I'm intrigued by your reference to lamination.  Could you give a few 
more details, like exactly what the process involves, and any pros or 
cons not mentioned in your message?  Thanks a lot.


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "seacap8" 
<photographer@g...> wrote:
> 
> 
> Douglas,
> I'm printing on an Epson 7600/9600 doing gloss with ultrachrome 
> inks. I have always loved the high gloss of a Ciba print and wanted 
> to get there. I purchased a copy of ImagePrint rip (ouch!) for 
> printing on Epson's premium gloss paper with the UltraChromes with 
> photo black ink. The prints come out gorgeous, but still display 
> some bronzing and gloss differential. Also you can really zero in 
on 
> the tints to your B&W from neutral to selenium or platinum tints.
> 
> 
> So here was my solution...
> First I printed up some BIG ones, 24x36 and took them to a local 
> digital lab that did laminating. I had them do a gloss laminate so 
I 
> could see the results. WOW! They looked just like a Cibachrome! 
> Really made the blacks pop also. They used a hot laminate. I have 
> done some more research and decided that there was not a big 
> advantage/disadvantage to hot over cold. So I went out and 
purchased 
> a cold laminator from Coda Inc. for $1500 (34" wide). Now I'm doing 
> cold laminates on my glossy prints (I can also mount with it), and 
> they do take your breath away if your into glossy. It sounds like 
> you are printing smaller than me, but there are some very 
reasonably 
> priced small laminators out there. Also the prints are near bullet 
> proof with the laminate on them...you can sit your cocktails on 
them 
> at the end of a long printing session...8-)
> 
> 
> 
> > hello all.....well I am still looking for a glossy paper success 
> > story......I have now lowered my standards again! I dont care if 
a 
> > print only lasts one month. I am looking for a way to get a BW 
> print on 
> > glossy paper, with a standard photographic look. Bronzing is not 
> > tolerable. People look at a print that has bronzing and they wait 
> about 
> > one second and say...."did you do this on your printer or 
> > something?..... What i need is to be able able to put a print in 
> > someone's hand and have them think that it was "developed", and 
> > therefore a "real photo"......(that is booking agent thinking by 
> the 
> > way)......not to be confused with a nice art print that will be 
> under 
> > glass, which the UT2 inks and art papers do so well. I have both 
a 
> > epson 1280, and an epson 1200. The 1280 ihas the UT2 inks. If you 
> have 
> > been reading my posts, you'll remember that  I am marginally 
> satisfied 
> > with spraying etc....but the pigments really dont cut it for 
gloss 
> when 
> > it comes right down to it. Most everybody agrees I think. SO ...I 
> also 
> > have the 1200 with lyson quad black dye inks. These are a pain 
> with all 
> > gloss papers too it seems. Lyson claims that they work with 
gloss, 
> but 
> > no matter waht, the dark areas ALWAYS turn blue when they dry. 
> That is 
> > on all gloss papers ecept epson cheap photopaper, which shows 
> bronzing 
> > real bad with the lysons. None of the other papers show bronzing, 
> just 
> > the blue color at 85% dark. I have tried profiles, curves, CMYK 
> curves, 
> > yadda yadda yadda......Black only is out of the question on the 
> 1200, 
> > because the dot pattern is really horrible......so I gave up on 
> these 
> > inks once before, and got the 1280, but still have this albatross 
> of 
> > gloss incompetence around my neck. ...does the R800 do gloss BW? 
> It 
> > seems that the 800 should be good for BO...BUT.....does it print 
> on 
> > gloss paper? Really really really?
> > I made a print on an HP that is supposed to do great BW, but it 
> looked 
> > wierd to me. Not bad but weird.  Geez.....

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.