Paul, just thinking out loud here... I've never got my hand on a 7000, so I don't know how the ink carts work, but should it possible to bulk load FS and print through the cone rip? Julian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> To: "DigitalB&WPrint" <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 7:01 PM Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Quad Ink Densities > Alessandro, > > You wrote: > > >I suppose that MIS Full Spectrum quads densities are very similar - if not > >equal - to Piezo, given that these inks are also known as "Cone clone". > >Am I right? > > They are very close, and they should be the same. I'd assume they are a > feasible substitute with at most minor corrections. > > To be honest, I haven't actually tried the production FS inks to see why > some users thing there needs to be a slight correction in the Piezo driver > dot gain (or whatever it is) box. I'm wondering if MIS missed the densities > slightly. Given all the density fluctuations with the Piezo and CIS > combination, it may be that some of that affected the design criteria, but > I'm guessing. (I was not involved in finalizing the mixing ratios.) On the > other hand, what I've found with the MIS VM system is that some Piezo > customers got used to their malfunctioning Piezo/CIS systems and thought the > distorted g/s ramp was normal. So, they may be "correcting" the system to > replicate their mal-functioning Piezo/CIS systems. > > Basically, though, the big picture is that the MIS VM, FS and Piezo inks are > about the same. I'm trying to establish an open system with competing inks > and workflows so that no one company can get a monopoly and stick it to us. > B&W photo has always been a technology that is affordable and easy for > creative types to use and manipulate. I want to be sure it stays that way. > So, if the FS densities aren't right on, I'll get some and see what can be > done to correct the situation. > > I might add that I've detected density differences between batches of inks > from the same company (both Piezo and MIS). There is no such thing as total > accuracy here. > > However, one reason we need the ink companies to do our basic ink mixing is > that my quick and dirty syringe mixing is not accurate enough to give > sufficient consistency. One needs very accurate scales and large volumes to > be even close to consistent with some of these critical ratios -- I'm > talking three digits of accuracy. The light inks are affected by changes in > their mixing ratios to the hundredths of a percent. > > > I have a set on its way to my eager hands, and I was planning to > >measure densities as well, but if you already did it I'd definitely trust > >your results rather than mine. > > Well, you really need to compare, for example, Piezo and the FS inks on the > same system with the exact same materials. The density ratios I put out > there are what I get for my system. All systems are a little different. > So, get the curve, 21-step test file, and print some Piezo (from a cart -- > not an old CIS that may have affected densities) and see what densities you > come up with. Then try the other ink and compare. Expect + or - 1-2% just > from printer variances. Even high end 7000s and drum scanners don't seem to > be more consistent. Perfection is impossible here. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com > > ___________________________________ > > Alessandro Pardi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Roark [mailto:paul.roark@...] > Sent: gioved\ufffd 1 novembre 2001 22.07 > To: DigitalB&WPrint > Subject: [Digital BW] Quad Ink Densities > > > > To judge ink densities, I print the 21-step test file using what I call my > "Color Test" curve. (The driver settings I use for this include Matte HW > paper type and No Color Adjustment.) This basically pumps out 100% of each > ink at a different part of the test strip. Then I scan the test strip and > do a levels on it. So, black is 100% and white is 0% when measured with the > eyedropper in Photoshop (if the image is in grayscale mode). > > Scanner settings, etc. can affect results, so I use the tool just to compare > inks -- and mix new brews. > > Piezo gives results as follows: K = 100, C = 84, M = 38, Y = 27%. > > <huge snip> > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Quad Ink Densities
2001-11-05 by Julian Thomas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.