--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Michaels" <bob@b...> wrote: > > I sent a 720 ppi file to my 1280 then resampled it to 360 and printed > it again. No difference to my naked eye, possible miniscule > differences with a very good loupe but it's a hard call. > > It was a very sharp detailed 6x7 neg scanned at 3200 ppi in a Minolta > MultiPro. Try resampling the 360ppi image back to 720ppi and then compare them in Photoshop. You may find that there's little if any difference, so you wouldn't expect to see a difference in the print either. Film scanners scan at a much higher resolution than the resolution you can actually get out of film. Many scanners can generate a 20 megapixel scan from 35mm film, but in real life you can get more resolution out of a 6-megapixel digital SLR than from 35mm film in most cases. I've done experiments where I downsampled film scans to 1/4 their size and back up again and found very little difference. I've also upsampled 6-megapixel digital SLR files to 20 megapixel and they had more detail than the 20-megapixel film scans. It would make more sense to try the experiement with a true 720ppi image from a digital SLR or with an artificially-generated test image that clearly had 720ppi worth of detail. -- Steve
Message
Re: 720 v. 360 ppi to Epson desktop, No output quality differences for me.
2004-11-13 by kanefsky
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.