--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > >> ...so can I assume that you see no difference between Piezo and > >>UT-FSN then? > > >... > >I do know piezotone is probably the best product but ... > > No, the UT family does better in fade tests, is glossy compatible, and > cheaper. That puts it ahead in my book. > > The hues are generally matched in that both follow the standard of the > lightly toned silver print, with spectrophotometer readings characterized by > midtone cyan = yellow, and magenta 0.01 density unit higher. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com Better in fade tests? Please tell the link where to read it! Regarding the hue: IMHO the overall look of an BW-print can't be described by a single midtone measurement. Equally measured the look can be quite different. The prices: For small carts and bulk ink you are right, but not for the larger 7xxx and 9xxx carts. Andreas
Message
Re: [Digital BW] comparison hue of piezotone selen - UT-FSN
2004-11-16 by aaltenmueller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.