Hello Michel, > <<..... For me, this is an acceptable amount of "burn off" > and it's a really nice Paper.....>> > >Clayton, by "burn off" do you mean a loss evenly spread all over the sheet surface ? Yes, there was an overall uniform slight loss of brightness and slight warming of paper color (by slight I mean _very_ slight). I want to add some more comments about OBAs, to add to my previous post (BTW, in that, I mentioned "P1" and "P2" - I should have said "W1" and "W2", referring to the whiteness scale used in the article. I was thinking "paper" color... I have not yet found a precise definition of what "burn off" actually means. Lots of people use the term without really knowing what it means, including myself (I think we all have the right idea, but I mean a precise scientific measureable definition). Even Diana York, when I asked her directly, couldn't tell me exactly what kinds were in their coatings, how long they would last, or to what degree the effects of burnoff would be. Those web links were the most scientific discussions of OBA I've yet found. According to the second one, even the term OBA is not scientifically precise: "Optical brightening agent is used colloquially, but is not precise, because brightness is defined for a small band of wavelengths only." Neither of these links uses the term "burn off" either. The closest one comes to that subject was in the paragraph about "lightfastness". This brief mention is the most scientific treatment of the subject I've seen so far. From what I gather so far, there are many different kinds of OBAs, they can have many different effects, and the newer ones are more stable and long lasting. As Diana pointed out, "Whiteness" and "Brightness" are not necessarily the same thing. Apparently, some OBAs enhance one or the other or both. This shows up in the papers. For example, Photo Rag is brighter, but not whiter, than Aurora Art (in the article, PR is rated at W4 and Aurora is W2). Premier Fine Art (W6) supposedly has no OBAs but it's actually quite bright (bright cream, not bright white). So there's more going on here than we understand. The point of all this is that to merely state that a paper has OBAs doesn't tell us enough to really know how the paper will perform. We don't know whether whiteness or brightness will be affected, to what degree, or over what time period. So I guess we need to collect anecdotal evidence over time before we can begin to know what to expect. However, I've been in this forum over three years now and can't recall ever seeing a "for sure" report of burn off. Only warnings that prints on OBA paper "might" eventually turn as yellow as the non OBA paper is to begin with. But that hasn't been my experience so far. My recent observation of the Condor prints was my first real world experience that I'm confident is attributible to OBA burn off. I've got some prints on PR 188 unprotected on a bulletin board under almost constant light for nearly three years. The old MIS FS ink has warmed and faded but the paper is still bright. So how long before burn off occurs on PR? >Generally speaking I never noticed any lost in brightness per say >all over the print but get a yellowish hue unevenly spread along >the edges. I haven't experienced that. There have been lots of reports of yellowing in reaction to certain chemical agents in packaging and tape, etc, and often edge yellowing is reportedly due to prints being stacked in a drawer or box, so only the edges are exposed to...whatever. >BTW, thanks for your article and the great work you have done there, >waiting to see the update. You're welcome. I'm happy to contribute something in return for all I've received in this forum. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: Matte Papers
2004-11-21 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.